AI pro se lawsuit targets $15B shell-company fraud at pharma giant

Opening a Page for the Retaliation Trial

There’s been a development regarding the retaliation case. I’ve decided to open a dedicated page on this website that will track everything about the retaliation case, from the original OSHA filing, to the dismissal, to the appeal that now moves this fight before a Department of Labor Administrative

They Tried to Go Behind My Back to the Judge

I need to tell you what just happened, because this is the kind of move that usually happens in the dark. The other side, some of the most powerful law firms in the country, tried to reach out directly to the judge’s chambers without me copied. On the surface,

Intent Is Already Proven. Reactivations, Deposits, and a Trail of Conscious Moves

This Isn’t Just Fraud. It’s Intentional. When you’re dealing with a billion-dollar corporate fraud, one of the hardest things to prove is intent. Anyone can say something was a clerical error, a misunderstanding, a paperwork issue. But when every action, across multiple states, multiple entities, and multiple

The Judge Just Approved Service on All Respondents & Just Granted The IFP (Fee Waiver) - The Game Just Changed.

Federal Judge’s Order On IFP & Service To All RespondentsOrdered on August 18th, 2025Judges decision .pdf181 KBdownload-circle On August 18, 2025, a federal judge granted my request to serve all named respondents in my petition to compel arbitrator appointment. That might sound procedural. But it’s not. This changes

They Lied to the Court, So I Filed a Notice

On August 18, 2025, I submitted a Supplemental Notice of Record Clarification in federal court — not to argue the merits of the case, but to correct provable false claims made by Respondent DRVM LLC in their response to my petition. Jorden’s Notice of False ClaimsFiled August 18th, 2025Notice of

How a Powerful Law Firm Just Tried to Sway a Federal Judge Before the Case Even Started

On August 14, 2025, DRVM’s law firm—Fisher Phillips LLP—filed a response in federal court before my fee waiver (IFP) was even granted or denied. That’s not normal. The rules are clear: service hasn’t been completed, the court hasn’t ruled on my ability to proceed,

They Called It a “Whistleblower Distraction” - Here’s How Corporations Try to Bury the Truth (DRVM Official Response)

A $15 Billion Case. A Federal Whistleblower. And This Is Their Response. DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator AppointmeFiled August 14th, 2025Respondent DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointme.pdf548 KBdownload-circle On August 14, 2025, the respondents in my federal petition — DRVM

Evidence #2 — Who’s Really Running the Shell Network?

In Evidence #1, I showed you my paystub from DRVM LLC, a dissolved shell company paying me while tied to a web of over 100 corporate entities at a single Las Vegas address. Now, let’s step back and ask: Who’s actually running this? Sanofi at the Top, But

Evidence #1 - My Paystub, a Shell Company, and a Billion-Dollar Question

This is where it starts. One paystub. One address. And one discovery that opened the door to a massive corporate network hiding in plain sight. In October 2024, I worked briefly inside a Costco location, handing out product samples for a company called DRVM LLC. These weren’t food samples

They Rigged Arbitration and Thought I’d Stay Quiet.

I followed the rules. I respected the process. But JAMS just proved what I feared: the system protects power, not truth. The respondents and I agreed: we’d use an AI-qualified arbitrator. That was the only reason this didn’t go to federal court months ago. That was the deal.

Filed in Federal Court: The Petition to Assign an Arbitrator in a $15 Billion Fraud Case

Hollingsworth V. Sanofi-Aventis US et al 3:25-cv-01342-AB The moment we all have been waiting for. On July 31, 2025, I officially filed a Federal Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointment under 9 U.S.C. § 5. After months of obstruction, concealment, and strategic delay by billion-dollar law firms, this case

The Strike List Was Built to Work Against Me, Even After I Cooperated

After months of delay tactics from the respondents. I complied with the process. I gave the system one last chance to act fairly. In return, JAMS issued a strike list so mismatched, it borders on deliberate obstruction. This is not a routine wage dispute or contract claim. This is one