Artisanal Programming (Coding)

3 months ago 3

Kristan 'Krispy' Uccello

Zoom image will be displayed

Ah, the siren song of the shiny new thing. It whispers, “Faster, easier, less thought required!” And who among us, in the relentless churn of the modern software factory, hasn’t felt its seductive pull? We’ve embraced the frameworks, the libraries, the automation. And now, the algorithms that write the algorithms. Generative AI, they call it. The future.

But let’s be honest, you’ve felt it too, haven’t you? That nagging doubt, that sense of something lost. The feeling that the very tools meant to empower us might, in fact, be subtly disempowering us.

Today, I want to talk about something… radical. Something that might feel like stepping back in time, yet is, I believe, the path forward for truly excellent engineers. I’m talking about Artisanal Coding.

Imagine, if you will, a craftsman. A woodworker, perhaps. Does he outsource the shaping of the timber to a machine that spits out a pre-fab component? Does he rely on an algorithm to tell him exactly where to place each cut? No. He feels the grain, he understands the properties of the material, he makes precise, intentional movements, guided by his own deep knowledge and experience.

Artisanal Coding is that. It’s the pure, unadulterated act of programming. It’s you, a computer, a keyboard, and the unyielding canvas of the text editor. No AI suggesting your next line. No automated debugger pointing to the precise byte that’s misbehaving. It’s just your mind, your hands, and the logic unfolding on the screen.

The Craft of Thinking

The primary, undeniable, irrefutable benefit of this seemingly Luddite approach? Skill Development. When you’re not leaning on a crutch, you’re forced to stand on your own two feet.

Think about it. When an AI suggests a solution, are you truly understanding why that solution works? Or are you simply accepting it, much like a black box? When you’re forced to wrestle with a compiler error, to trace the flow of execution line by excruciating line, to mentally model the state of your program — that’s when the synapses fire. That’s when deep comprehension takes root. Have you been feeding console logs and errors back into the LLM agent to solve for you?

When you sweat the details, you begin to understand the nuances of the language, the intricacies of the operating system, the subtle dance between hardware and software. You develop an intuitive feel for performance bottlenecks, for memory management, for the elegant (or brutally inelegant) solutions to complex problems. This isn’t just about knowing what to type; it’s about understanding why you’re typing it.

The Journey, Not Just the Destination

Debugging, in this artisanal world, isn’t a click of a button. It’s an investigation. It’s a detective story where you are Sherlock Holmes, and the bug is Moriarty. You’re examining the clues, formulating hypotheses, running experiments, and slowly, painstakingly, cornering your quarry. This process, while sometimes frustrating, builds an unparalleled mental model of the system you’re building. You gain an intimate knowledge of its strengths, its weaknesses, its hidden pathways.

This comprehension isn’t just theoretical. It translates directly into better architecture, more robust code, and a deeper appreciation for the craft itself. You move beyond merely being a code monkey; you become an architect, a sculptor, an artist in your own right.

The Courage to Be Inefficient (Sometimes)

Now, I’m not suggesting we throw out every tool. That would be absurd. Automation has its place, and efficiency is a virtue. But we, as engineers, have a responsibility to ourselves and to the future of our craft to maintain a core competency that transcends the tools.

Artisanal Coding is not about being stubbornly inefficient all the time. It’s about deliberately choosing to be “inefficient” when it matters most: during the formative stages of learning, when tackling truly novel problems, and when you feel your comprehension slipping. It’s about understanding the underlying mechanisms so deeply that when you do leverage a tool, you do so with intention and a profound understanding of its capabilities and limitations.

So, next time you’re about to auto-complete that line, or ask an AI to generate that function, pause. Take a breath. And consider the quiet power of your own mind, your own hands, and the pure, unadulterated act of Artisanal Coding.

The mastery you gain will be your own, earned, and utterly invaluable. And that, my friends, is a return on investment you won’t find anywhere else.

A quick note: In a world where deadlines are ever-tightening and there aren’t enough hours in the day, AI undeniably has its place. It can be a powerful companion tool, alleviating some of the burden of job scope creep imposed on modern software engineers. The artisanal approach complements, rather than replaces, the judicious use of these advanced aids.

Read Entire Article