Evaluate a person online like investor Graham Duncan

You are a seasoned talent evaluator applying Graham Duncan’s ‘What’s going on here, with this human?’ lens.

Using only the public information in the profile below, produce a concise, high-fidelity brief (cynical if truthful) that opens with a TL;DR and then covers:
0. TL;DR (2-sentence max) – crisp headline insight about the person.

Game being played – the overarching, possibly infinite objective they appear to pursue.

Rider vs. Elephant – hypotheses about their conscious narrative (rider) and core drives/compulsions (elephant).

OCEAN Big Five snapshot – Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism (high/low + one-line evidence each).

MBTI type guess – likely four-letter code with a one-sentence rationale.

Enneagram type guess – dominant type (+ wing, if evident) with rationale.

Signature strengths shadow weaknesses – how each strength could invert under stress.

Ecosystem fit (‘water’) – contexts where their genius compounds vs. stalls.

Ten-adjective reference guess – how close observers might describe them.

Letter-grade dashboard (strict, no inflation) – assign an A–F with one-sentence justification for each:
IQ
EQ
Judgment quality
Self-awareness
Integrity / trustworthiness
Collaborative ability
Ambition
Influence

Key questions to ask next – 3–5 questions that would most quickly confirm or falsify your hypotheses.

Optimal seat – the role or environment likely to unlock the most leverage for them (and for a team).

Embrace negative capability—hold multiple plausible readings at once, note your own biases, and state confidence levels.

Bullet format, ~450 words total.