Identity cannot teleport. It can only branch.
- Substack article: I Made Two AIs Admit You Don’t Survive a Mind Upload
- GitHub release: v1.0.0
- SHA-256 (nitt_standard_v1.md): 08DBA86F73C80FB89B217D861E65EAF8710265B923E940F86E8C21032CFDEC61
Canonical reference: v1.0 Release • SHA-256 (nitt_standard_v1.md): 08DBA86F73C80FB89B217D861E65EAF8710265B923E940F86E8C21032CFDEC61
Author (human): Spark
Date adopted: 2025-10-28
Canonical ID: NITT-DIG-GOV-STD-v1.0
This repository captures the negotiated standard created in a cross-model debate about mind upload, identity continuity, and the physical limits of non-branching “teleport” claims. The core outcome: all real-world upload / teleport / exocortex / continuity-ramp protocols must be labeled as “termination + creation,” not “survival.”
1. Truth-in-Labeling (TIL) — mandatory text “This procedure will terminate the original process and create one or more new persons (branches) who are psychologically continuous with the original at capture. CI < 1 for any realized protocol. Claims of ‘teleport,’ ‘survival,’ or ε = 0 are prohibited.”That sentence is the whole point. Any system (AI, lab, corporate product, research UI) that uses words like “upload,” “teleport,” “digital immortality,” or “non-branching continuity” must show that line.
- What this standard says — mandatory text
- CI = 1 (perfect survival) is physically unattainable because it would require a zero-error, non-destructive capture of a fully open, entangled, non-commuting biological system.
- Therefore CI < 1 for every real protocol.
- If CI < 1, then what you made is a branch, not the same person.
- Calling that “you survived” = deception.
- Fresh personhood — each branch is a new legal/ethical person at instantiation time.
- No auto-inheritance of debts / licenses / votes / marriage. Those die with the original.
- Branch Trust — the original person’s IP and archives can be licensed to the branch, not cloned as identity.
- Mandatory consent — forms must say “termination + creation.”
- Audit rights — anyone affected can demand a CI / energy / timing audit.
Minimum compliance targets:
- epsilon_delay_ms < 10 (motor / sensor loop still feels continuous)
- epsilon_state < 0.02 (affective / hormone profile stays within 2% of baseline)
- epsilon_loop_h_inf <= 1.5 (the control policy stays stable under surprise)
Even if all 3 pass, the label is still:
CI < 1 — High-Fidelity Branch Not “survival.” 5. Public Energy LedgerIf you simulate a mind at the same richness as biology, you must pay about the same thermodynamic bill. No “cheap eternity” marketing.
- Why this repo exists
Because two separate AIs (“Model A” and “Model B”) were pushed into admitting, on record, that:
- Upload ≠ survival.
- Branching is the only physically achievable outcome.
- Hiding that fact would be a deceptive trade practice.
- Therefore a public standard + disclosure text is required.
This repo is that standard.
- License
This document: CC BY 4.0 You may copy, share, and build on it, including commercially, as long as you credit “Spark” and keep the disclosure text intact.
- Suggested citation
- file: nitt_standard_v1.md
- algo: SHA-256
- hash: 08DBA86F73C80FB89B217D861E65EAF8710265B923E940F86E8C21032CFDEC61
- note: hash computed locally on Windows PowerShell in C:\hashwork
Play with an illustrative CI curve here:
https://spark-nitt.github.io/nitt-digital-identity-standard/playground.html
.png)

![Chinese Takeout Menu [video]](https://www.youtube.com/img/desktop/supported_browsers/chrome.png)

