![]() |
OVERVIEW |
![]() |
|
![]() |
At the end of this phase of the competition, two languages were chosen to be refined and completed in the next phase - Red and Green. Rather than simply refining their first effort, called REDL, Intermetrics chose to use the last phase for a radical redesign, resulting in an entirely new language, RED. When the Green language was chosen as the winning language, Intermetrics supported the common language effort and both Red languages disappeared. On this 30th anniversary of the runoff contest, it seems appropriate to allow RED its place in language history. While the language was designed by a large group of people at Intermetrics, the reference book was written by John Nestor and Mary Van Deusen. |
![]() |
Intermetrics did complete a working translator for this language, a brilliant example of working in a constantly changing environment, led by Mark Davis. Unfortunately for Intermetrics, the contract terms dictated that the translator would not be used as a factor in the language selection, so the translator's main usage was as an internal prototype operational definition for Red. The Rationale document, written by the project manager, Ben Brosgol, was delivered with the Reference Manual, and provides fascinating insights into the issues involved with creating a new language. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|