When Japan Airlines and Finnair departed Helsinki for Tokyo-Haneda back-to-back, the race was on. The 15 June flights took opposite paths to Tokyo, with JAL heading north and taking a polar route, while Finnair tacked south. Just after take off, we wanted to see who would be the first to touch down in Tokyo.
Japan Airlines’ 777-300ER JA733J departed Helsinki’s Vantaa Airport at 15:56 UTC, giving it a two minute head start on Finnair’s A350-900 OH-LWI. Shortly after takeoff it looked like JAL would make it to Tokyo well before Finnair. It had departed first and was taking a shorter route.
But Finnair had speed and wind on its side. By mid-way through the flight AY61 was projected to arrived 45 minutes before JL48 thanks to advantageous winds, especially over the Black Sea, and the A350’s overall speed advantage compared to the 777.
Even though Finnair flew 457 additional track kilometers, it managed to make it to Tokyo nearly one hour faster than JAL. Both airlines flew 4,000 kilometers further than the great circle route between the two cities, due to both carriers not using Russian airspace. At their farthest point apart, the two flights were separated by approximately 6,380 kilometers.
Finnair has been particularly impacted over the past few years by the airspace restrictions. The Nordic airline’s business model in large part was buoyed by its ability to quickly connect passengers between Europe and East Asia.
Why choose a different route?
If the southern route is so much faster, why did Japan Airlines fly north in the first place? Each airline performs a series of calculations for every flight that provides the optimal routing based on a variety of factors. Aircraft performance, weight, winds, en route weather, traffic, overflight fees, and other factors can all play into the decision to fly a particular route.
Comparing AY61 and JL48 both airlines have utilized both polar and southern routes on a regular basis. The best route for the day will always depend on weighting competing factors and choosing what works best for the airline to get its aircraft, passengers, and cargo to their destination safely.
Comparing new and old routes
What about compared to flights prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine? We flew aboard Finnair’s flight to Tokyo not long after and compared the two.
12 Responses
-
FIN is a Lido Flight customer, finding best routes.
-
Really fascinating to see how routing and jet stream winds can completely flip expectations! I wouldn’t have guessed that flying 457 km more could still result in arriving nearly an hour earlier.
-
Just took Finnair polar route back from Tokyo to Helsinki. 12:20/30 min give or take on what was meant to be a 12:50 flight. Seems Finnair seeks tailwinds. Fastest I saw us at was like 597mph with a strong tailwind.
-
But that plane is faster too. Not just tail winds.
-
Not relevant. .84 compared to .85
-
-
-
Thanks for the analysis. Another similar case is the Pacific route between SFO and HKG. HKG-SFO takes 2 hours less than SFO – HKG thanks to tailwinds.
-
FWIW, tt would have been just as accurate to say SFO-HKG takes two hours more due to headwinds.
-
-
Would be interesting to know the cost differentials between the two routes
-
what about the effects of cosmic radiation for the crew and passengers while flying close to north pole?
-
Cosmic radiation is higher on polar routes. The early dose affects mostly flight attendants flying HEL-JPN routes. They may clock near max early hours + fly polar. Some may get to the max radiation dose limit.
-
-
After these flights i calculated the extra hour of fuel cost, but didn’t get around to calculate overflight fees. Did anyone do that? Still wondering wich was cheaper.
-
JAL 48 – flight time 13:20 and fuel consumption 11.4 tons/hour = 153.9 tons of kerosene
AY 61 – flight time 12:34 and fuel consumption 9.8 tons/hour = 123.2 tons of kerosene
30.7 tons of kerosene x 3.16 = 97 tons of CO2 less generated by FinnAir
Get the latest aviation news delivered to you
Get the latest aviation news delivered to you
Flight tracking and aviation industry news direct to your inbox
Aviation news comes quickly, so join more than 1.7 million others who receive weekly aviation industry and flight tracking news from Flightradar24 direct to their inbox.
- The best aviation photos
- Bite-sized aviation news
- Exclusive flight tracking data
Ian Petchenik
Ian Petchenik’s love of aviation began at an early age growing up next to Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. As Flightradar24’s director of communications and co-host of the AvTalk podcast Ian now gets to share that passion for aviation with millions of Flightradar24 users and listeners around the world.
Most wanted airport receiver locations
We’re always looking for additional receiver hosts in areas that either lack coverage or need additional coverage. Help us grow the Flightradar24 ADS-B network.
Get weekly updates on Flightradar24 and have the latest aviation news land in your inbox.
- The best aviation photos
- Bite-sized aviation news
- Exclusive flight tracking data
AvTalk Episode 324: Five flights to nowhere
Most wanted airport receiver locations
We’re always looking for additional receiver hosts in areas that either lack coverage or need additional coverage. Help us grow the Flightradar24 ADS-B network.
How flight tracking works
Flightradar24 combines data from several data sources including ADS-B, MLAT and radar data.
When Japan Airlines and Finnair departed Helsinki for Tokyo-Haneda back-to-back, the race was on. The 15 June flights took opposite paths to Tokyo, with…
Iran, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Israel have closed their airspace following Israeli strikes in Iran. …
Air India flight 171 from Ahmedabad to London crashed just moments after take off on 12 June. The aircraft lost height and impacted structures…
Ian Petchenik
Ian Petchenik’s love of aviation began at an early age growing up next to Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. As Flightradar24’s director of communications and co-host of the AvTalk podcast Ian now gets to share that passion for aviation with millions of Flightradar24 users and listeners around the world.
Explore the top 10 most tracked aircraft and find out why these particular aircraft draw so much interest.
Help to grow our flight tracking coverage
We are continually looking to improve our flight tracking and the airports below are where new receivers will add the most coverage. Apply for a receiver today and if accepted you’ll receiver a free Flightradar24 Business Subscription.
Try the full Flightradar24 experience free for 7 days