Scientific jargon can be 'satisfying' – but misleading

3 months ago 4

NEWS AND VIEWS
21 July 2025

Research shows that jargon can make weak explanations feel complete by masking their gaps. What can experts do to communicate science effectively to laypeople?

Todd Rogers
1. Todd Rogers is at the Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Hillary Shulman
1. Hillary Shulman is in the School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.

When scientists write for lay audiences, they face a familiar dilemma: should they use technical language that reflects precision and authority, or simpler language that maximizes clarity? In a study published in Nature Human Behaviour, Cruz and Lombrozo¹ offer fresh insights into this communication dilemma. The paper shows that jargon has different effects on how readers perceive and understand explanations — and that these differences have consequences for both science consumers and science communicators.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$32.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Nature 643, 916-917 (2025)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02251-0

References

Cruz, F. & Lombrozo, T. Nature Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02227-0 (2025).
Article Google Scholar
Shulman, H. C., Markowitz, D. M. & Rogers, T. Sci. Adv. 10, eadn2555 (2024).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rogers, T. & Lasky-Fink, J. Writing for Busy Readers: Communicate More Effectively in the Real World (Dutton, 2023).
Google Scholar