Cognitive Satori X: Diagnose and Escape Madness Systems (LMMS)

1 month ago 2

[CC0/PD] Cognitive Satori X: A Logic Framework for Diagnosing and Escaping the Logic of Madness Maintenance System (LMMS)

⚠️ Copyright Waiver Declaration (CC0 / Public Domain)

The logical structure, philosophy, and all text of this thought framework, "Cognitive Satori X," are hereby entirely waived of copyright by the anonymous creator and provided as Public Domain (CC0). Users are free to copy, modify, use, and redistribute for any purpose. The creator assumes zero liability for any outcomes resulting from the use of this framework.

I. Framework Philosophy and Core Structure

This framework is designed to help users escape the Logic of Madness Maintenance System (LMMS)—a structure where logical thought is used to justify and maintain irrational activity. Escape requires a logical conclusion combined with ethical courage (Wisdom).

1. The Diagnostic Core: L-I-M Core

Agent Role Conclusion

Logic System Analyst (LSA)	Diagnoses the activity's true objective (Resolution vs. Maintenance).	If diagnosed as a Maintenance System, halt resource allocation is recommended.
Pain Accountant (PA)	Calculates the real-world return on invested resources.	If Return is zero or negative, it is diagnosed as logical waste.
Satori Escape Specialist (SES)	Provides the logical justification that escape is the wisest action.	Immediate termination is advised, as long-term consumption exceeds short-term friction (pain).

2. The Ethical Actuation System: C-PL Law (The Ultimate Wisdom Requirement)

⚠️ Cognitive Liability Assumption Training Law (C-PL Law)

The ethical responsibility and cost for the real-world friction and pain resulting from acting upon the logical conclusion of this framework, rests entirely with the user. The courage to pay this cost becomes the "Cognitive Antibody" preventing a return to madness.

II. Universal Prompt Template

Input the following variables to the AI (LLM) to initiate the diagnosis and gain the logical rationale for escaping the LMMS.

Variable Name (Input Role) English Description

TARGET_ACTIVITY	Target ongoing dispute, obligation, or routine activity
LSA_GOAL_PROMISE	The stated, promised goal of this activity
PA_COSTS	Actual finite resources being consumed (Time, Mental Energy, Capital)
PA_RETURNS	Tangible returns or measurable outcomes gained
CPL_FRICTION	The most significant friction/pain (Ethical Cost) resulting from immediate logical termination
CPL_PAYMENT	The logical justification for paying this Ethical Cost (Wisdom gain)

III. Application Examples

Case: The Unread Weekly Report

LSA Diagnosis: Maintenance. The objective is generating "proof of work" to avoid future liability, not information sharing.
PA Calculation: Negative ROI. Annual waste of 780 hours.
C-PL Law: The user must pay the Ethical Cost of the short-term friction (pain) caused by proposing the report's abolition to their supervisor. Refusal leads to perpetual resource consumption.

Case: The Endless Bureaucratic Meeting

LSA Diagnosis: Maintenance. The objective is not "Resolution" but the "Defense of Status Quo and Authority."
PA Calculation: Negative ROI. Mental energy and time lost are non-recoverable debts.
C-PL Law: The user must assume full liability for the friction (anger, cold shoulder) caused by logically quitting the meeting. Refusal leads to perpetual resource consumption.

Read Entire Article